New York – An external lawyer appointed by the judge advised the criminal case against the mayor of New York City Eric Adams to the judge on Friday permanently rejected the case, instead of agreeing to the Ministry of Justice’s request to abandon it at the present time while maintaining the right to restore it in the future.
“The court has a limited, but decisive role” to play in assessing the efforts of the Ministry of Justice to stop prosecuting the Democratic Mayor on charges of corruption.
Clement wrote that the judges have no authority to force the administration to continue to prosecute the case. But the judges have a role in approval how The case is rejected as soon as the administration decides to abandon it. In the Adams case, “appropriate treatment” is a permanent dismissal, Clement Clement, Del, Del, told us.
Clement suggested that allowing the administration to retain the right to revive the charges may create an inappropriate appearance on the mayor. Or acknowledged that it may create an actual fall, as the administration can use the threat of charges to pressure the mayor to help President Donald Trump’s agenda.
Ain Ho Clement last month to make “aggressive” arguments about the administration’s attempt to abandon the charges against Adams. Clement’s recommendation should not be followed.
The extraordinary effort by the senior Trump administration officials has caused the cessation of Adams to prosecute a crisis in the Ministry of Justice. Emile Bouv, who is the 2nd official in the ministry, ordered the Office of the Public Prosecutor in Manhattan, who brought the case, to drop it and do so “without bias”, which is a legal term, which means that the accusations can be re -was directed. Pova’s order led to a rebellion inside the department, which led to the resignation of Daniel Sasson, who was the interim American lawyer of Manhattan, and many senior prosecutors in New York and Washington.
In her resignation letter, Sasson claimed to be a supporter between the Ministry of Justice and Adam
In Mujoza, Clement Hijjah targeted that public prosecutors should keep the ability to bring accusations again in the future. Clement wrote that this scenario will create “a clear feeling that the claim shown in the indictment and approval of it by the Grand jury can be renewed, which is a suspended possibility like a sword of Damocles the example on the accused.”
“This constant possibility of arrangement is a special problem when it comes to the sensitive task of prosecuting public employees,” Clement wrote. ))
If the Ministry of Justice is committed to rejecting the case now, the administration must do so “with bias” – this means that the charges cannot be revived. This scenario would eliminate the “distinct appearance problems” presented by an elected official sitting in light of a “permanent possibility” of childbirth.
While Adams initially agreed to the efforts of the prosecutors to drop the case without bias, since then the judge has also asked the case to permanently drop the case. Public prosecutors did not respond to this request.
