Whenever the White House loses the court’s battles, the more Illon Musk targets the federal judges who dare the ruling in ways that he does not like. With the summary of Jay Willis in the balls and strikes, the Republican activist “was constantly publishing, calling for isolating” fake judges “,” corrupt “,” judges “to violate the will of the people.” The schedule is scattered … with conspiracy ponds around the mysterious hidden motives that these judges He should It was to prevent other than the elected billionaire from taking the authority of the legislative and executive branches for itself. “
But while donors in Donald Trump’s campaign apparently better can do a bit through Dog’s endeavor, he cannot launch dismissal campaigns against judiciary members. At least now, this force is still in the hands of Congress.
The problem, of course, is that Musk ideas find good among some Republicans in Capitol Hill. For example, Republican Senator Mike Li from Utah published a message to the social media that has read, “The corrupt judges must be isolated.” He came in the wake of a similar message that I read, “This has a feeling of coup – not a military coup, but it is a judiciary.”
Meanwhile, in the House of Representatives, there are now four separate decisions to hold accountable targeting federal judges, including two Republican Representative Andy Oagles of Tennessee. The menu is likely to grow: Ogles hosted an “Empeacchaoon” event online last week, showing a poster of 11 judges that he and his right -wing colleagues focus on.
Ogles appeared alongside a comment reading “Judge Hunter” woke up. A clip from the event was upgraded shortly by Musk itself.
It is difficult to say with the confidence of what these legislators hope to achieve, because the parliament’s possibilities actually agree on the dismissal decision that does not actually exist, but if the Republican supporters in the campaign are trying to intimidate the judges to submit, they apparently fail. The most prominent colleague in MSNBC Jordan Robin SmackDown is the brutal judicial judicial:
“The US President is not king,” wrote a federal judge against President Donald Trump on Thursday. The American boycott judge, Bayril Haul, in Washington, DC, made a blatant statement in refusing Trump’s attempt to dismiss Join Wilkox from the National Council for Labor Relations.
It was a great judgment. “The president has no power to end the members of the National Council for Labor Relations at the Will, and his attempt to launch the plaintiff on its position in the board of directors was a flagrant violation of the law.” She added: “The expected, expect such a power seizure, broken in Article Three, and not the second article, the authority to interpret the law, including resolving disputes over checks in Congress on presidential authority. The president’s interpretation of his constitutional strength – or more appropriate, is a flat error.”
In a message that appeared specially designed for the Oval Office, the jurisprudence concluded that “the American president is not a king – not even a” national ” – and his rules in removing federal employees and civilian employees like the plaintiff is not absolute, but he may be restricted in the appropriate circumstances, as it exists here. … the president who tells a picture of himself as a” king “or” a dictator “, perhaps his vision of the active leadership, The role in Article Two of the United States Constitution.
Och.
This came in the wake of a ruling from last month in which the American boycott judge John Kognor – who was called the Federal Seat Ronald Reagan – was not only rejected Trump’s executive about consuming citizenship, but was also aimed at the president’s twisted approach to the law.
“It has become clear that for our president, the rule of law is only an obstacle to the goals of his policy,” Kognor wrote. “The rule of law, according to him, is something that must be moved or simply ignored, whether it is to achieve political or personal gains. However, in this courtroom and under my hour, the ruling of the law is a bright beacon that I intend to follow.
The judge added: “The Constitution,” is not something that the government can play political games with it. “
These are not the only modern examples of Trump that face judicial rhetoric in the midst of a legal setback – some judgments on January 6 in particular – and given the scope of lawsuits surrounding the White House’s agenda, may not be the last.
Ogles may add well to the “Empeacchaoon” menu, but there is not much indicating that the judiciary feels fear.
This article was originally published on msnbc.com
