Maga World turns against Supreme Court judge Amy Kony Barrett

WASHINGTON – Maga activists have turned against one of the appointed President Donald Trump in the Supreme Court: Judge Amy Kony Barrett.

Barrett, who was appointed by Trump in 2020, appoints a strong governor who joined the main rulings in which the court transferred US law to the right, including abortion and positive procedures.

But this is not enough for some of Trump’s most aggressive supporters, who believe that a former law school professor at Notre Dame was disappointment. Maga supporters see what some call an independent chain as a sign that it is not enough enough with Trump or pro -loyal.

“Weak and shy.”

Barrett defenders rejected the attacks, and they mocked the idea that maintaining justice is specific through how its decisions are compatible with Trump and the insistence that Barrett will not be affected by external criticism. Barrett, which was reached through the Supreme Court, did not respond to a request for comment.

The anger stems from Davis and other right-wing personalities with great follow-up on the Internet mostly from two prominent decisions, 5-4 in which Barrett was the decisive vote against the Trump team.

The quick and spray reviews of the right -wing figures, who were running Trump this week when Barrett and other judges refused to try the Trump administration to avoid pushing an American agency to international development contractors as he was ordered by a federal judge.

“Dei Judge”, influencer Jack Buswobic posted on X, indicating that Barrett was “diversity, injection and inclusion rights”, is supposed to be a woman.

Trump promised at the time to choose a woman to replace liberal justice, Ruth Badr Ginsburg.

“Amy Kony Barrett was appointed,” wrote Laura Loomer.

Post has a picture of the Barrett family. Barrett and her husband have seven children, among them two adopted from Haiti, black.

Even the brief Barrett with Trump earlier this week, when he gave a address of Congress, was examined by the Maga group online.

Rogan Ohnley, a Maga character influentially known as DC_Draino, was written in a post containing a video for the interview.

A law professor Josh Blackman at South Texas College at Houston has suggested that Barrett should step down from setting her life in the Supreme Court so that Trump can choose an alternative.

The White House did not respond to a message seeking a comment.

Barrett’s defenders, with Derek Muller, resisted a professor of law of Notre Dame, who studied during the Barrett, saying in an interview that he questioned that she would be affected by negative reactions.

“She is determined to be on the field as the other judges do,” he said. Judges know that “lack of popularity is not a measure of what the judge does.”

The conservative national review was also evaluated, as it published a column on Thursday entitled “In the Defense of Judge Amy Kony Barrett”, which sparked “nonsense” criticism.

Barrett’s vote by the US International Development Agency followed a decision in January when the court, which was divided again 5-4, rejected Trump to ban a hearing to judge his criminal funds in New York. The decision paid angry reactions from the voices supporting a garment, including Davis.

In both cases, Barrett joined his colleagues, conservative president John Roberts, in the majority, and is compatible with the three liberal judges.

Even before these cases, Barrett has increasingly showed a willingness to separate herself from the right side of the court with a deliberate and cautious approach.

What critics have failed online to address is that Barrett has been constantly made by major votes in favor of the conservative reasons, including when the court canceled the rights of Landrark Roy against Wadi, ending the positive procedure, expanding weapons and undermining the authority of federal agencies.

“It seems to me that there is this motivation as Donald Trump’s personal loyalty is considered in an indisputable way as a demand for justice to sit in the Supreme Court. It does not matter how much the port’s portfolio does not matter.”

Breette’s cruel criticism comes in a group of similar discourse and sometimes more violent aimed at the judges who stopped the Trump agenda.

Roberts recently warned that the threats of violence and intimidation against judges have increased in recent years.

Barrett previously talked about how she was appointed to the Supreme Court – and the security concerns she is going through – affected her and her family.

Like all judges, she has protection not only in court but also at her home in Virginia.

At a judicial conference last year, she recalled one of her children asking her why she had a bulletproof jacket.

The security of the judges was in the spotlight three years ago after the early draft leakage of the ruling of miscarriage. Then, it was the activists on the left who were angry with the decision.

An armed man was arrested outside the house of Judge Brett Cavano and was charged with murder. The demonstrators also gathered outside many judges’ homes, including Barrett.

“After the assassination of Judge Cavano, we need to be vigilant about potential threats,” Blackman said in an email.

But he stood beside his criticism of Barrett, saying that some conservatives feel that they had misled the type of justice it would be.

“I think conservatives feel that there is taste and replacement,” he added.

This article was originally published on NBCNEWS.com