UK reform investigation lawyer in contradiction to MP Robert Lowe’s statement

UK reform investigation lawyer in contradiction to MP Robert Lowe’s statement

Robert Lowe Robert Lowe talks to an audience with a small microphone registered on the side of his face.The media of the Palestinian Authority

Robert Lowe was accused of threats of violence against the President of the United Kingdom – which is what he denies

A senior lawyer appointed by the UK to reform the United Kingdom to investigate independently in allegations against Representative Robert Lowe and denied his team from comments and attributed to them.

The great MP Yarmouth was suspended through reform and indicated to the police about accusations that he had committed threats of violence against his president.

The Capital Police confirmed that they are evaluating the claim of “verbal threats”.

There were also allegations of bullying in Louis offices, which are being investigated by the party’s lawyer.

Louis strongly denies all the claims, saying, “There is no reliable evidence against me,” and says he is a victim of “a political assassination because I dared question Nigel Faraj.”

Remove the whip from Louis, which means that he is now sitting as an independent deputy.

His comment came yet Daily Mail He published an interview with Louis, where he said that the reform was under the leadership of Nigel Faraj remained a “protest party led by Christ.”

“I have seen a number of data made by Mr. Louis MP that are attributed to me and that described my reactions to the operation that the party conducted in the allegations he made against both Mr. Louis Mitt,” said the lawyer, KC or King Louis MP, which is attributed to me and that describes my reactions to the operation conducted by the party in the allegations made against both Mr. Louis Mitt, his manager, “said the lawyer, KC or King’s lawyer, who has not been named by the party, but his BBC.

“I find myself in the unfortunate and unfortunate situation to have to make this statement to correct the record.”

The lawyer added: “I did not express either” dismay “or” shock “at any time regarding the process. I did not say,” There is reliable evidence against [Mr Lowe]”Not to mention this” again and again. “

On Friday, Louis assumed a problem with a statement issued by the reform, which determined that there would be an independent investigation into what happened.

“There is no reliable evidence against me”

I wrote: “I just spoken to KC. I felt dismay because this statement was done, and I repeated that no evidence was sent against me.

I stated that this was issued before the investigation began.

“She was shocked by this process, was shocked by contact with the party, and she was shocked not to provide any reliable evidence, despite her repeated requests.”

The BBC Lawy’s statement, who issued his own statement in the response.

“Since this harmful attack was launched on my reputation, all I asked for both reform and KC is a reliable evidence against me. None of them was presented. It was not the case,” he said.

“KC said it was” chasing “so. I did not receive anything. Because there is no reliable evidence against me.”

He added: “I spoke with KC lengthy, and through the phone and through the message. I must know her during the past week, and she was very useful, and she is a charming lady trying to do her work in the very difficult situation that her repair has put.”

“You have to stand in front of the girls.”

The party was accused of a “frank lie” of claiming that he did not cooperate with the investigation, which is to reform the claim in a statement on Friday evening.

“I was in discussions with my legal team this afternoon, and this will follow the legal action in a timely manner,” Louis told the BBC.

“My name will not be pulled through the mud as part of a political assassination because I dared to question Nigel Faraj. You have to stand in front of the infiltrators, and I do it exactly.”

He said that the lawyer told him on Friday night: “I have advised that you should simply say that the party was arrogant in indicating that these allegations were submitted without saying that the party had cost an independent investigation and that the investigation has not yet passed to look at all the evidence and evaluate it.”

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *